Group2


 * Evaluating Web Sites Chart**

Site 1 []. Rank 3 Strengths: Good design elements. Wording is easy to understand. Weaknesses: Difficult to navigate. Poorly designed and unorganized. Difficult to find credible sources.

Site 2 []. Rank 4 Strengths: Design was clean. Weaknesses: Not all links work. Some links were irrelevant to the main topic. Limited to links and does not provide scholarly resources

Site 3 []. Rank 5 Strengths: Very well designed, organized, and presented. Lots of links. Weaknesses: Credibility is false. Information is presented in a satirical manner.

Site 4 [] Rank 2 Strengths: Use of graphics is well organized. Good Credibility. Content was clear. Useful links. Weaknesses: Sources were not as comprehensive.

Site 5 [|http://www.umich.edu/~engtt516/index2.html]Rank 1 Strengths: Very well informative. Lots of outside sources. Clear and organized. Weaknesses: Aesthetically, difficult to see because the contrast of the font color and background.

In one or two sentences, defend your choice for the #1 site related to the criteria you were assigned: The number 1 site we chose was site #5. because it was the most credible and unbiased. The content was accurate, links were organized, and there was also good use of graphics.