Group+11


 * Evaluating Web Sites Chart**

Site 1 Name. BP: 4 Strengths: Good for kids, easy to read and navigate through and links were helpful. Weaknesses: Site was cluttered and not reliable. Unclear purpose.

Site 2 Name. Smoking from all Sides: 5 Strengths: Tried to cover all perspectives Weaknesses: Some links were not working and not relevant. Boring to navigate.

Site 3 Name. DHM: 3 Strengths: Links were important for some people to know (EX: Dairy) and layout was easy to follow. Good side links (related info) = good credibility. Weaknesses: Does not present both sides of argument equally and may be hard for younger users to understand. Selling product takes away from credibility.

Site 4 Name. Dino: 1 Strengths: Easy navigation, good navigation with pictures to follow. Distinguishes fact vs opinion. Berkeley site, therefore reliable. Weaknesses: Layout was not engaging - design, color, etc.

Site 5 Name. Jacopo: 2 Strengths: Descriptions on pictures, easy to follow and was unbiased and relevant links. Design was good - flash intro and good navigation. Weaknesses: Outdated disclaimer on link validity.

In one or two sentences, defend your choice for the #1 site related to the criteria you were assigned: Dino site was the most credible with relevant links that outlined what was fact and fiction. Easy to navigate through and author was not biased. Wide audience appeal - kids and scholars.