Evaluating Web Sites Chart

Site 1
http://bigredhair.com/boilerplate/. Rank 3
Strengths: Good design elements. Wording is easy to understand.
Weaknesses: Difficult to navigate. Poorly designed and unorganized. Difficult to find credible sources.

Site 2
http://smokingsides.com/. Rank 4
Strengths: Design was clean.
Weaknesses:
Not all links work. Some links were irrelevant to the main topic. Limited to links and does not provide scholarly resources

Site 3 http://www.dhmo.org/. Rank 5
Strengths: Very well designed, organized, and presented. Lots of links.
Weaknesses: Credibility is false.
Information is presented in a satirical manner.

Site 4 http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/dinobuzz.html Rank 2
Strengths: Use of graphics is well organized. Good Credibility. Content was clear. Useful links.
Weaknesses: Sources were not as comprehensive.


Site 5 http://www.umich.edu/~engtt516/index2.htmlRank 1
Strengths: Very well informative. Lots of outside sources. Clear and organized.
Weaknesses:
Aesthetically, difficult to see because the contrast of the font color and background.



In one or two sentences, defend your choice for the #1 site related to the criteria you were assigned:
The number 1 site we chose was site #5. because it was the most credible and unbiased. The content was accurate, links were organized, and there was also good use of graphics.