Evaluating Web Sites Chart

Site 1
http://bigredhair.com/boilerplate/. Rank 3
Strengths: Good design elements. Wording is easy to understand.
Weaknesses: Difficult to navigate. Poorly designed and unorganized. Difficult to find credible sources.

Site 2
http://smokingsides.com/. Rank 4
Strengths: Design was clean.
Not all links work. Some links were irrelevant to the main topic. Limited to links and does not provide scholarly resources

Site 3 http://www.dhmo.org/. Rank 5
Strengths: Very well designed, organized, and presented. Lots of links.
Weaknesses: Credibility is false.
Information is presented in a satirical manner.

Site 4 http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/dinobuzz.html Rank 2
Strengths: Use of graphics is well organized. Good Credibility. Content was clear. Useful links.
Weaknesses: Sources were not as comprehensive.

Site 5 http://www.umich.edu/~engtt516/index2.htmlRank 1
Strengths: Very well informative. Lots of outside sources. Clear and organized.
Aesthetically, difficult to see because the contrast of the font color and background.

In one or two sentences, defend your choice for the #1 site related to the criteria you were assigned:
The number 1 site we chose was site #5. because it was the most credible and unbiased. The content was accurate, links were organized, and there was also good use of graphics.